Visa Appeals
Received an S57 letter? You have one opportunity to respond before a decision is made.
A Section 57 letter means the Department has information it believes could lead to refusing your visa, and it is giving you a limited window to respond. Most people who receive one don't fully understand what an effective response requires. We do.
2-Day Cooling-Off Period
No Pressure to Sign
Transparent Fees
Payment Plans Available
LGBTIQ+ Welcome
Understanding Your Letter
Section 57 of the Migration Act 1958 is a procedural fairness obligation. Before the Department of Home Affairs refuses a visa application on the basis of information that is adverse to the applicant, it is legally required to first give the applicant an opportunity to respond to that information.
In plain terms: the Department has found something it doesn't like about your application. The Section 57 letter is its formal way of telling you what that is before making a decision. It is not a refusal. It is an invitation, and it may be one of the most important documents you ever respond to.
The letter will set out the specific adverse information the Department is considering. You then have a set time, usually 28 days, to provide a written response and any supporting evidence. The Department will take your response into account before making its final decision.
If you do not respond, or if your response does not adequately address the concerns raised, the Department will typically proceed to refuse the visa based on the adverse information it holds. A refusal can then be appealed to the Administrative Review Tribunal, but it is always better to prevent a refusal at this stage than to challenge it afterwards.
The quality of your response to a Section 57 letter is often the single greatest determinant of whether your visa is granted or refused. This is not a step to handle without professional guidance.
Response Deadline: Usually 28 days from the date of the letter. Some letters give less. The deadline is strict and missing it has serious consequences.
It Is Not a Refusal: Receiving a Section 57 letter does not mean your visa has been refused. It means refusal is being considered. You still have an opportunity to change the outcome.
Targeted Response Required: Your response must directly address each specific piece of adverse information identified. Generic responses or simply submitting more documents without explanation is rarely effective.
One Bite at the Cherry: You typically get one chance to respond. The Department is not required to issue multiple S57 letters, and it may decide immediately after reviewing your response.
Third Party Information: The adverse information may come from a third party such as a previous partner, a former employer, or an anonymous tip. You have a right to know what it is and respond to it.
Get Advice Immediately: Do not wait. The earlier you engage a lawyer, the more time your team has to build a thorough, well-evidenced response before the deadline.
How to Respond
An effective Section 57 response is not simply a letter saying you disagree. It is a carefully structured, point-by-point rebuttal, supported by evidence, that gives the decision-maker a clear basis to resolve each concern in your favour.
The response must be calibrated precisely to what the letter says. Addressing the wrong issues, introducing new problems, or submitting evidence without explaining its relevance can all undermine your position. This is why professional preparation matters.
Need a response prepared urgently?
We draft S57 responses across all major visa types. Most responses are completed well within the deadline, with time for your review. Consultations available today. Book an Urgent Assessment Here.
1
Every word in a Section 57 letter is deliberate. The specific language used tells you what the Department is concerned about. Understand exactly what is being alleged before you respond to anything.
🔍 Check whether the adverse information comes from a specific source, a document, or a general concern, as each requires a different type of response.
2
If the letter raises three concerns, your response must address all three. Silently ignoring any concern allows the Department to treat it as uncontested. Structure your response to mirror the letter's structure.
📋 A well-structured response references the specific paragraph or concern from the letter before addressing it.
3
Unsupported assertions carry little weight. Every factual claim in your response should be supported by a document, a statutory declaration, or both. Evidence must be relevant to the specific concern being addressed.
📎 Statutory declarations from the applicant, sponsor, and third-party witnesses are particularly powerful when properly drafted.
4
Attaching a bank statement or a flight record without explaining how it addresses the concern is insufficient. The response must tell the story of why each piece of evidence is relevant and what it demonstrates.
💡 Decision-makers review hundreds of files. The clearer and more organised your explanation, the more persuasive it is.
5
Your response should resolve concerns, not create new ones. Volunteering information that raises further questions, contradicting previous statements without explanation, or making claims you cannot support can worsen your position.
⚠ Have a lawyer review your response before it is submitted. A fresh set of expert eyes often catches issues you have missed.
6
📅 Keep a copy of everything submitted and confirmation of receipt from the Department.
Why Choose Us
We Move on Deadline: When you receive a Section 57 letter, every day matters. We prioritise urgent S57 matters and can have a consultation scheduled the same day you contact us.
If It Goes Further, We're Ready: If the Department refuses despite a strong response, we are positioned to move directly to an ART review. You don't need to start again with a new firm and repeat the process from scratch.
Many visa applications that receive a Section 57 letter are ultimately granted. The outcome depends almost entirely on the quality of the response. The adverse information the Department holds is not necessarily the final word, it is an allegation. A well-prepared response gets to respond to it, challenge it, and put it in context. That is what we do.
28
Typical days to respond
All
Typical days to respond
0
Pressure to proceed
2
Day cooling-off period
Frequently Asked Questions
A Section 57 letter is not a refusal. It is a notice from the Department advising you that it has adverse information it is considering and giving you an opportunity to respond before it makes a decision. A refusal is the actual decision not to grant the visa. Receiving a Section 57 letter means you still have a chance to influence the outcome.
The deadline is set out in the letter itself. The most common timeframe is 28 days from the date of the letter, but some letters give less time depending on the circumstances. The deadline is strict. Contact a lawyer as soon as you receive the letter so preparation can begin immediately.
Extension requests are possible but not guaranteed. The Department may grant an extension in genuine circumstances, such as where documents need to be obtained from overseas or where there are health or personal circumstances that have prevented preparation. However, you should not assume an extension will be granted. Begin preparation immediately while any extension request is being considered.
If you do not respond by the deadline, the Department will proceed to make a decision based on the information it already holds, including the adverse information identified in the letter. In most cases, this results in a refusal. While an ART review may then be available, it is always preferable to address the concerns before a refusal occurs rather than after.
A Section 57 letter arises in the context of an ongoing visa application before a decision is made. A Notice of Intention to Consider Cancellation (NOICC) arises after a visa has already been granted and the Department is considering cancelling it. Both are natural justice notices that give you an opportunity to respond, but they arise at different stages of the immigration process and carry different consequences. We handle both.
If the Department is satisfied with your response and resolves the adverse information concern in your favour, it will continue assessing your visa application. Depending on the visa type and whether all other requirements are met, the visa may then be granted. There is no guarantee of a grant, as other requirements still need to be satisfied, but resolving the Section 57 concern removes the specific barrier identified in the letter.
Section 57 applies to a wide range of visa applications, but there are some exceptions. For example, the natural justice provisions operate differently in some protection visa contexts, and certain visa cancellation processes operate under different procedural fairness frameworks. If you are uncertain whether your letter is issued under Section 57 specifically, get legal advice to understand the correct framework and deadlines.
This is precisely what the Section 57 process is designed to address. You have the right to refute the information with your own account and supporting evidence. Explain clearly why the information is incorrect, provide evidence that contradicts it, and where possible identify the likely source and explain why that source may be unreliable or motivated by something other than truth. A clear, evidence-backed refutation is entirely appropriate and often effective.
A statutory declaration is a written statement of facts, signed before a witness authorised to take declarations, such as a Justice of the Peace or solicitor. In S57 responses, statutory declarations from the applicant, sponsor, and supporting witnesses are commonly used to provide a sworn account of relevant facts. They carry more weight than unsworn letters. In most cases, we recommend including at least one statutory declaration from the applicant and sponsor.
This is a serious allegation. If the Department is considering that false or misleading information was provided in support of your visa application, you need specialist legal advice urgently. A finding of fraud or misrepresentation can result not only in visa refusal but also in a three-year exclusion bar from lodging another visa application. The response in these cases must be very carefully prepared and legally precise.
In most cases, no. The Department is required to put adverse information to you before deciding, but it is not required to issue multiple letters about the same matter. If new adverse information comes to light separately from the original concern, a further letter may be issued. Do not assume you will have another opportunity to respond to any concern raised in the letter you have received.
No. Receiving a Section 57 letter means the Department has concerns it wishes to put to you before making a decision. Many applications that receive a Section 57 letter are ultimately granted after a strong response. The letter is a warning and an opportunity, not a predetermined outcome.
Technically yes, but it is not advisable. The response must be carefully calibrated to the specific legal concerns raised in the letter, supported by appropriately prepared evidence, and structured in a way that the decision-maker can follow. Mistakes in a self-prepared response are often irreversible, and a poor response can make a subsequent ART appeal more difficult. Given what is at stake, professional assistance is strongly recommended.
Evidence should be directly relevant to the specific concern raised in the letter. For relationship concerns, this typically includes financial records, communications, travel records, statutory declarations from the couple and witnesses, and anything else that demonstrates the nature and genuineness of the relationship. For character concerns, independent evidence of good character may be required. The key is relevance and explanation, not volume.
Yes. Third party information, including information from former partners, employers, or anonymous sources, can and should be challenged if it is inaccurate. The Section 57 process exists precisely to give you this opportunity. Your response can provide a contrary account supported by evidence. The weight given to third party information versus your response is a matter for the decision-maker, but a well-evidenced rebuttal often succeeds.
A refusal after a Section 57 response is still reviewable at the ART in most cases, subject to the applicable deadline. Importantly, the fact that you engaged with the process and provided a response is relevant context for the ART. If you engaged us to prepare your response, we are already familiar with your case and can move directly to ART proceedings without you needing to start again with a new firm.
It depends on whether the deadline has passed. Check the response deadline on the letter immediately. If the deadline has not yet passed, contact us now, there is still time to prepare a proper response. If the deadline has passed and no response was provided, the Department may have already decided. Contact us urgently to find out where your application stands and what options remain, including ART review if a refusal has been issued.
Yes. While your response must address the specific concerns in the letter, you may also include additional positive information that strengthens your application more generally. For example, if your letter is about relationship genuineness, you might include updated evidence of shared finances that was not in the original application. However, be careful not to introduce information that raises new concerns or contradicts prior statements without proper explanation.
Professional fees depend on the complexity of the letter, the number of concerns raised, and the volume of evidence needed. We discuss fees transparently at your initial consultation and provide a clear fixed fee quote before any work begins. We do not begin work without your informed agreement, and our 2-day cooling-off period means you can engage us without immediately committing.
Yes. We regularly assist applicants who are outside Australia. Consultations can be conducted by video or telephone, and we can prepare, review, and submit responses on your behalf regardless of where you are located. Evidence gathering from overseas may require some lead time, which is another reason to contact us as soon as you receive the letter.